Why Central Bank Digital Currency Might Disrupt Financial Systems
The
increased adoption pace of digital technologies is forcing countries to adapt
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
This has made many decision-makers set up
mechanisms for change in the past five months. A move that will completely
disrupt the financial systems.
A special report by Fitch Rating insinuates
that the rise of private digital payment platforms with a strong network effect
could “create oligopolies among payment-system providers.”
Private companies could end up controlling so
much of individual personal data, a concern that has been raised within the
academic circles.
The US, for example, belatedly stopped
Facebook from launching its own cryptocurrency, Libra, for fear that it could
undermine the importance of the dollar in world trade.
China, too, had its own problems with
Alibaba’s Ant Group and Ten Cent’s WeChat Pay. The two platforms control 90
percent of China’s payment space.
It is perhaps the only country that foresaw
the growing influence of these platforms on people’s lives and the possibility
of creating a parallel currency in crypto. This perhaps explains why the
country had to fast-track the release of the e-yuan.
The recent report by Fitch Rating indicates
that one of the key benefits of retail CBDCs lies in their potential to enhance
authority-backed cashless payments with innovations in step with the wider
digitalization of society.
In some developing countries, CBDCs are seen
as a major opportunity to bring the unbanked communities into financial systems
and also “improve the cost, speed, and resilience of payments.”
However, a recent report, The Impact of
Cryptocurrency Adoption on Government by the Government Blockchain Association
shows that blockchain used in CBDCs offers more benefits than previously
thought.
This is in relation to the fact that this
emerging technology could support public transparency and trust, improve
accountability, promote innovation to foster technical and business
efficiencies and provide value-added services previously unavailable to the
public.
Could the benefits that blockchain is bringing
be a risk to CBDCs? The simple answer is yes. The Economist of May 8 issue
front page that reads: Govcoins (CBDCs): The digital currencies that will
transform finance explains it clearly.
In essence, banks would have to find other
financing sources to back their loans.
And sucking money out of the banks could
undermine business creation and shift the power to bureaucrats to influence
credit. Above all, CBDCs could alter geopolitics by providing a cross-border
payments and alternatives to the dollar, “the world’s reserve currency and the linchpin of America’s influence.”
But some economists are dismissing CBDCs as
unworkable since they are likely to increase the interest rates on loans by the
banks.
Their argument is based on the likelihood of
the banks being forced to raise interest rates on deposits from individuals and
organizations for which central banks provide a direct alternative.
However, some of these details have not been
dealt with. Many governments are still studying how all these changes may
affect the banking industry. But the transformation journey is on.
The least we can do is to start preparing for
an almost certain future.
This
article was written by Prof.
Elijah Bitange Ndemo, an ICT Champion, academician, and newspaper columnist with
the Kenyan newspaper Daily Nation and its sister publication, the Business
Daily.
Comments
Post a Comment